Discussion of hearing procedures and rules of evidence. [See also the transcript of the open discussion, 1966 page 305.]

A discussion of hearing procedures and the rules of evidence. [See also the transcript of the open discussion, 1966 page 110.]

A discussion of hearing procedures and rules of evidence. [See also the transcript of the open discussion, 1966 page 263.]

Discussion of pre-hearing procedures, hearing procedures, and rules of evidence, with additional remarks regarding history and theory on these matters. [See also the transcript of the open discussion, 1966 page 214.]

A discussion of the following procedural disputes: Ruling on arbitrability before hearing the merits – ex parte hearings – calling the opposing party’s witnesses first – admissibility of settlement offers – new evidence not discussed during previous steps of the grievance procedure – whether cross-examination is limited to the scope of direct-examination – cutting off …

The author asserts that problems unique to industrial jurisprudence should give us pause in drawing upon the analogy of the due process protections afforded in other forums. Regarding one constituent of just cause, that author opines that the arbitrator should not be a party to a “rigged award” – one solicited by management and labor …