The author examines the increasingly adversarial and legalistic nature of arbitration and how it undermines the objective of providing a quick, efficient and cost-effective means of dispute resolution. He then…
The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly stated that arbitrators do not have to apply the Rules of Evidence. However, they are not precluded from doing so. This article discusses how…
Decisional thinkingNew York panel report
Christopher A. Barreca, Thomas G.S. Christensen, Wayne E. Howard, Morris E. Lasker, Alvin B. Rubin, Howard Schulman
January 1, 1980 Proceedings Database
A survey of the pooled knowledge and experience of judges, advocates, and arbitrators; as to how decisions come into being and how they are shaped by the institutional framework within…
The Chronicle
- The future of labor arbitration – a challenge
- International comparison of the role of neutrals in resolving shop floor disputes. Lessons for arbitrators.
- Arbitral discretion: The tests of just cause
- Is the labor movement on the right course?
- The presidential address: Advocates I have known
- National Mediation Board – Adoption of the Code of Professional Responsibility for Arbitrators of Labor-Management Disputes
- Committee on Professional Responsibility and GrievancesOpinion No. 17
- Arbitration forums 2. Mature collective bargaining relationships
- Arbitration forums 1. Academia
- The arbitration process: 2. Arbitral craftsmanship and competence. Comment