A survey of the evolution of the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Canada in matters of grievance arbitration. From 1975 to 1986 the Court… Read More »The Supreme Court of Canada and Grievance Arbitration: A Persistent Vision of Legal Integration
Arbitrators and advocates in both the United States and Canada face similar issues, but the outcomes are often different due to differing values, customs, contracts,… Read More »Comparative Arbitral Outcomes
The NAA intervened, and Michel Picher presented oral argument in this case, which dealt with the appointment of persons to hear disputes under the Hospital… Read More »The NAA at the Supreme Court of Canada
In the Seneca College case, the Divisional Court ruled that the arbitrator has an obligation to consider all remedy, including aggravated and punitive damages, and… Read More »Canadian labor trends
The article addresses recent developments in judicial standards of review of arbitrators’ awards in Canada, and furnishes an update of the NAA involvement in a… Read More »Legislation and court developments in Canadian arbitration – 2003
Use of the internet, including email, in the organized Canada workplace, the right of free speech, attacks on the public employer by an employee, and… Read More »Free speech and privacy in the internet age: The Canadian perspective
An examination of uniquely Canadian initiatives to streamline and expedite the grievance arbitration process.
The article notes the differences between arbitration in the United States and Canada, arising from differences of culture and of the respective arbitration systems. The… Read More »When arbitration is not the answer: Problem-solving approaches to today’s workplace: Workplace violence – The proper role for arbitration
An examination of free speech workplace issues in the public and private sectors in Canada.
The author posits that the present forms of union organization and representation are not adequate to meet l of the organizational and representational challenges that… Read More »The forms and limits of representation