Arbitrator Aaron opines that the immediate effects of Lincoln Mills may be disruptive of industrial relations, because most judges are both poorly informed on the subject and have attitudes that…
Professor Cox states the legal effects of the Lincoln Mills decision, and offers three assertions: 1) those involved in arbitration cannot ignore judicial decisions under section 301; 2) the construction…
A panel discussion of arbitration after the Lincoln Mills decision. Mr. Ross sees a need “to restore and protect some of the traditional values of arbitration” by viewing arbitration “not…
Implementation of arbitration awards
Ben Fischer, Alexander C. Mekula, George A. Moore, Jr., Laurence F. Seibel, Raymond E. Shetterly
January 1, 1971 Proceedings Database
An examination, through example, of the results that flow from arbitration awards. Arbitrators are accountable for the acceptability of their own awards. Consequently, regardless of the ruling on the merits,…
The Supreme Court’s 1960 Steelworker Trilogy decisions established that arbitration was the quid pro quo for the collective bargaining agreement’s no-strike provisions, and directed that judicial deference. In this Chapter,…
The Chronicle
- The future of labor arbitration – a challenge
- International comparison of the role of neutrals in resolving shop floor disputes. Lessons for arbitrators.
- Arbitral discretion: The tests of just cause
- Is the labor movement on the right course?
- The presidential address: Advocates I have known
- National Mediation Board – Adoption of the Code of Professional Responsibility for Arbitrators of Labor-Management Disputes
- Committee on Professional Responsibility and GrievancesOpinion No. 17
- Arbitration forums 2. Mature collective bargaining relationships
- Arbitration forums 1. Academia
- The arbitration process: 2. Arbitral craftsmanship and competence. Comment