The author describes factors for the “clogging” of the arbitration process and that threaten the “final and binding quality” of decisions. These factors include “passing the buck” to the arbitrator; “fair representation” concerns; the tendency for “legalistic” proceedings; and the increasing involvement of external law. Suggested new approaches include pre-hearing disclosure of facts and offers of proof; expedited hearing procedures; mediation of grievances; and non-binding pre-hearing advice as to probable results, leaving the parties free to withdraw or proceed to arbitration.