Presidential Address by Roberta Golick
President Golick states that arbitrators bring their world views, duty of neutrality and adherence to Supreme Court philosophies when writing evidence-based decisions.
President Golick states that arbitrators bring their world views, duty of neutrality and adherence to Supreme Court philosophies when writing evidence-based decisions.
An explanation of the current legal framework for employment arbitration and recommended standards to protect the parties including, especially the individual non-union employee.
A discussion of employment arbitration and the due process protection of the parties involved
The author describes arbitrators’ varying approaches to the arbitration hearing, from active and interventionist, to passive, permitting the advocates to present their cases as they… Read More »Search for the Truth: The “Active” Arbitrator – Exploration of New (or Different) Initiatives – What is an Arbitrator’s Role in the Hearing Process?
The Supreme Court’s 1960 Steelworker Trilogy decisions established that arbitration was the quid pro quo for the collective bargaining agreement’s no-strike provisions, and directed that… Read More »The TRILOGY at 50 – Foundation for the 21st Century: A Half Century of the Steelworkers Trilogy: Fifty Years of Ironies Squared?
Attorney Boone examines how industrial democracy has been promoted by the Trilogy cases.He examines the intellectual, legal, and historical context of the Trilogy; and the… Read More »The TRILOGY at 50 – Foundation for the 21st Century: Collective Bargaining as the Foundation for Industrial Democracy and Arbitration as an Integral Part of Workplace Self-Government
Arbitrator Jaffe invokes his personal experiences to illuminate desirable objectives of the arbitration process; e.g., the development of an adequate record, asuring a fair and… Read More »Search for the Truth: The “Active” Arbitrator – Exploration of New (or Different) Initiatives
A panel gives practical advice for achieving a one-day hearing.
Mandatory arbitration – the employee’s agreement to arbitrate, rather than litigate, all disputes (including staturory disputes) with his/her employer, has been the subject of empirical… Read More »Due Process in Employment Arbitration: The Arbitration Fairness Act & Future of the Process – III. Mandatory Arbitration is Better Than It Looks
The authors assert that precluding class actions would undermine the private enforcement of important public policies, including nondiscriminationand consumer protection. If class actions are eliminated,… Read More »Mandatory Arbitration of Employment Class Action Disputes: From the Perspective of Plaintiffs’ Counsel