An examination of the differences between arbitrability and jurisdiction. Author Justin posits that an arbitrator serves as parties’ agent, with the arbitrator’s award viewable as a contract of settlement, and…
A report of the Committee on Law and Legislation for 1969, National Academy of Arbitrators
The NAA agora: What’s right with labor arbitration, and how to keep it that way.
Roger I. Abrams, Richard I. Bloch, George H. Cohen, James S. Cooper, Joan G. Dolan, Harry A. Rissetto, Theodore J. St. Antoine
March 16, 2006 Proceedings Database
A panel discussion about the roll of the arbitrator, the mentoring and acceptance of new arbitrators, continuing education and training, and best practices.
The Committee presents 16 cases from the courts and the Labor Board that it considers significant for the developmentof the law of labor arbitration.
A review of the cases and papers that preceded and followed the Trilogy cases.
Professor Eisenberg examines develops in public sector arbitration in New York City and State, including (1) the status of the arbitrability presumption, (2) some changes in policy on the subject…
In 1968, significantly fewer cases involving assertion of rights under collective bargaining agreements were reported than in prior years. The U.S. Supreme Court rendered only one decision relevant to this…
A report of the Committee on Law and Legislation for 1971, National Academy of Arbitrators, with a focus on Section 301 actions under the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA) reported…
Judicial review: As the parties see it
Lloyd H. Bailer, Emanuel Dannett, Michael H. Gottesman, Robert M. Landis, Stephen R. Reinhardt
January 1, 1972 Proceedings Database
Four advocates expound on the topic of judicial review of arbitration awards. Judges may defer to labor arbitration awards because they believe that any mistakes by the arbitrator pertain to…
Enterprise Wheel permits judicial scrutiny of labor arbitration awards to determine whether an award draws its essence from the collective bargaining agreement. The imprecision of that standard of judicial review…