NAARB - Serving the U.S. and Canada Since 1947

Home » Archive

Professor Gershenfeld’s observations about interest arbitration. He examines the criteria for making monetary decisions, scope problems in the non-monetary areas, the “coercive comparison,” and the role of “public interest” factors (e.g., the effect of a settlement in one part of an organization on other upcoming bargains in the same organization). The “arb-med tool” is discussed.

Read more

In public school disputes, arbitrators will be faced with challenges to the arbitrability of a wide range of subjects. The challenger will assert that, despite the fact that the parties have a contractual provision on the subject, the subject was not a proper one for bargaining, as it falls within the exclusive prerogative of the …

Read more

A description of Michigan’s system of legislated, issue-by-issue, final-offer, police- and fire-service arbitration, under which arbitrators are to consider, among other things, “the interest and welfare of the public,” the “stipulations of the parties,” and a m?lange offactors, seemingly aimed at economic issues, such as vacations, holidays, excused time, insurance and pensions, medical andhospitalization benefits …

Read more

A comprehensive study of the elements of federal labor relations and collective bargaining outside of the private sector, where both sides need to understand and respect the process as a channel for resolving employee-employer tensions. The Civil Service Commission and its responsibilities as well as the newly created Federal Impasse Panel are discussed, along with …

Read more

Discussion of grievance arbitration, distinguishing federal sector from state and local government experience. Includes discussion of advisory arbitration, types of issues submitted, available forums; differences in extent of unionization within public employment; limits on adopting private-sector practices in the public sector; and possible directions of development.

Read more

Problems of proof in the arbitration process: Report of the Pittsburgh Tripartite Committee

A discussion of hearing procedures and rules of evidence. [See also the transcript of the open discussion, 1966 page 263.]

Read more