Arbitration and the courts: Part 3. NLRB deferral to arbitration
Judge Mikva asserts that NLRB deferral to the arbitration process is wrong when the arbitration process does not fairly represent the individual grievant’s rights.
Landrum-Griffin Act of 1959
Presidential address: Labor arbitration today
President Anderson provides a brief historical survey of labor arbitration in the United States, both grievance and interest, and cautions arbitrators to discharge so as… Read More »Presidential address: Labor arbitration today
The National Labor Relations Act: 1935-1985 (II: The pendulum swings)
An analysis of Supreme Court cases influencing the development of collective bargain and arbitration, and of the shift of the NLRB’s deferral standards, and reasons… Read More »The National Labor Relations Act: 1935-1985 (II: The pendulum swings)
A colloquium on the arbitration process
A discussion of whether arbitration satisfies the needs of the parties with respect to expediency, expense and justice. Also discussed is whether management and labor… Read More »A colloquium on the arbitration process
The labor arbitration process: 1943-1963
The author explores two major lines of criticism of the labor arbitration process: The cost – time-lag – formality problem, and the management rights problem.… Read More »The labor arbitration process: 1943-1963