admissibility

Evidence in labor arbitration: How arbitrators rule.Going beyond “Taking It for what it is worth”: Are there basic principles of evidence in laborarbitration?

March 16, 2005February 13, 2019

Arbitrator Winograd examines the derivation and purposes served by the broad admissibility of evidentiary submissions in labor arbitrations, and subsequent assessment of reliability and weight… Read More »Evidence in labor arbitration: How arbitrators rule.Going beyond “Taking It for what it is worth”: Are there basic principles of evidence in laborarbitration?

A debate: Should labor arbitrators receive evidence “For what it’s worth?”Union, management and neutral’s perspectives

March 16, 1998February 13, 2019

The Union advocate discourages the admissibility of evidence that is not reliable, relevant and material, and recommends that arbitrators advise the parties why evidence is… Read More »A debate: Should labor arbitrators receive evidence “For what it’s worth?”Union, management and neutral’s perspectives

Evidence: Taking it for what it’s worth.

March 16, 1987January 25, 2019

Two NAA members joust over the conflict between confining admissible evidence to the relevant and material, and becoming unduly legalistic.

Admissibility of evidence

March 16, 1982January 30, 2019

Excerpts from workshops on the admissibility of evidence. The subjects include 1) the grievant’s prior employment record; 2) spotters’ reports; 3) decisions of other tribunals;… Read More »Admissibility of evidence

Problems of proof in the arbitration process: Report of the Pittsburgh Tripartite Committee

January 1, 1966January 25, 2019

A discussion of hearing procedures and rules of evidence. [See also the transcript of the open discussion, 1966 page 263.]